The Wichtia Eagle reported on Wednesday
Defenders of evolution, despite earlier pledges of a boycott, plan to present three days of evidence in support of the scientific theory at hearings next month.
A science education group, meanwhile, intends to offer daily commentary when supporters of the concept of intelligent design make their case.
The stage will be two sets of hearings May 5-7 and May 12-14 in Topeka before a three-member committee of the State Board of Education. All three members favor de-emphasizing evolution as the board adopts new science standards this year.
Pedro Irigonegaray, a Topeka lawyer, provided no specifics about who will testify in support of standards recommended by a science education committee. He said he is representing, at no charge, that committee's majority, whose evolution recommendations were rejected by the state board.
"The majority concluded that a response is needed," he said.
This appears to be a shift from the boycott announced earlier this month by Kansas Citizens for Science. But it may be that the effort organized by Irigonegaray is an independent effort. Whatever is the case, I think KCFS is on target with these comments.
These “science hearings” will be nothing but a tax-supported showcase for Intelligent Design creationism.
The science, religious, and educational communities will not remain silent, however. The coalition is planning a number of events to present their views outside the “hearings” process. Details will be announced as they are available.
“Intelligent Design Creationism is a theological idea, which the Constitution does not allow to be taught in public school science classes,” said Harry McDonald, President of Kansas Citizens For Science. “Our young people need to learn useful science, not religiously based ideas like Intelligent Design Creationism, in science classes. The future is in bioscience, and we want our young people to be part of that future.”
1 comment:
There was a debate on PBS the other night between a proponent of "intelligent design", who also happened to sit on the board of the Discovery Institute,and an evolutionary bioligist. Its a little scary that they're actually getting so much exposure but the ID guy got absolutely decimated and ended up admitting he was talking philosophy and not science. This needs to happen at the school board meeting.Here in Montana we tried to get a resolution passed in the legislature supporting the exclusion of non-scientific hypotheses in public funded science classes but failed.Some bastard from KANSAS showed up telling half truths and emotional psuedo-religious fear mongering crap... sorry, they really piss me off.
Post a Comment