Upworthy is a great for progressive memes,videos, infographics and the like. While I recommend it highly, a recent infographic on the Universal Declaration of Rights is almost great, but it contains a major mistake, misrepresenting the UDHR and promoting a retrograde, reactionary definition of a fundamental right. And to make matters worse the infographic has a copyright notice on behalf of the UN. Which means that the UN has, whether intentionally or, endorsed a most controversial simplification that rewrites the UDHR.
The infographic by Zen Pencils is introduced by Ray Flores with these words:
Did you know that the United Nations outlined what basic rights and
freedoms we are entitled to? It's called the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights. I’m really glad Zen Pencils drew up this simplified
version, because it sure looks like a lot of countries need a refresher.
Yeah, America, I’m looking at you, too!
Can you spot the problem with the infographic?
How about in this enlargement?
Now?
In contrast, look at Article 18 of the
UDHR
Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion;
this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and
freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or
private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice,
worship and observance. (emphasis added).
"The right to
belong a religion" is a poor simplification of these 47 words. A better simplification would be "Everyone has the right to
choose a religion." One fewer word. And it is big difference.
It seems that Zen Pencils and the United Nations need their own refresher course.
Some of the worst religious persecution is done by those who believe you have a right to belong to a religion as long as it is their religion or the religion you were born into. But no right to join a new religion or to reject religion.
Wikipedia's article on
religious freedom notes
Among the most contentious areas of religious freedom is the right of
an individual to change or abandon his or her own religion (apostasy), and the right to evangelize individuals seeking to convince others to make such a change.
Other debates have centered around restricting certain kinds of
missionary activity by religions. Many Islamic states, and others such
as China, severely restrict missionary activities of other religions. Greece,
among European countries, has generally looked unfavorably on
missionary activities of denominations others than the majority church
and proselytizing is constitutionally prohibited.[68]
Another wiki article
notes
many modern Hindus are opposed to the idea of conversion from (any) one religion to (any) other per se.[39]
...conversion out of Hinduism is not recognized.[44]
Historically, the overwhelmingly dominant position in Islamic jurisprudence applies the death penalty to apostasy (from Islam). Both law and public opinion in contemporary Islamic societies still impose heavy penalties on those who wish to change theirw religion or to have no religion at all.
See
this article on "Apostasy in Islam" on wikipedia. for some details, including poll results on the public attitudes towards religious freedom in Islamic societies.
A 2010 poll by Pew Research Center showed that 86% of Muslims in
Jordan, 30% in Indonesia, 76% in Pakistan, 6% in Lebanon and 51% of
Nigerian Muslims agree with death penalty for leaving Islam.
A 2007 poll by Policy Exchange revealed that 31% of British Muslims
believed that leaving the Muslim religion should be punishable by death.
Let's hope Zen Pencils and the United Nations will fully embrace the full concept of religious freedom enshrined in the UDHR and not a watered down version that de facto enables religious discrimination and persecution. How about changing the wording on this infographic and creating one dedicated to the full meaning of religious freedom in the UDHR?